Visiting Hours

Audience Reviews

View All (70) audience reviews

steve d really cheap and cheesy. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review william k Adequate, but not quite memorable slasher doesn't spare us with some nasty scenes; however, it's remarkable that Shatner and Grant participated in this mayhem. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member Some of my favourite childhood memories involved me being in a local video shop (and there were quite a few in my area) and poring over the lurid and sleazy artwork for the horror movies. In the 80's video shops were like art galleries for weirdos and I was (and proudly still am) one of these freaks. One of the video artworks that I was obsessed with was for the Canadian movie Visiting Hours. When I rented the movie I wasn't disappointed. I love horror movies based in hospitals especially if they're made in the early 80's and are really nasty. Another example is of course, Halloween 2 which is a peach of a movie. But Visiting Hours is also a great movie. And the hospital the film is set it in seems to be a hundred times bigger than Haddonfield Memorial Hospital and has more than ten people in the whole establishment (staff included). Visiting Hours concerns Colt Hawker (no, his character isn't a gay porn actor even though his name sounds like he should be) who is obsessed with Deborah Ballin, a TV journalist who campaigns for female victims of domestic violence at the hands of their partners. She is shown defending one such woman who was driven to murdering her husband after he had abused her. Hawker is triggered by this because of a childhood memory he has which recalls his mother throwing a pan of boiling oil in his father's face after he had tried to beat her. Hawker invades Ballin's home and sets out to kill her. After a really nasty confrontation Ballin is injured but survives and is taken to the local General Hospital. Colt learns where she is and starts to stalk her. It's in the hospital that most of the film's action now takes place. It's interesting to see that Colt will adapt any variety of aliases and roles to get to his quarry- nurse, orderly, surgeon and finally, patient. Deborah seems to be so hated by him that even those who sing her praises or sympathise with her now being a victim of male violence become a target for Hawker. Nurse Sheila Monroe becomes one such with Hawker following her home to find out her address and later in the film invading it. Any strong woman is an enemy of Hawker's and needs to be dealt with accordingly. Of course, with such a villain and his repugnant views, the film was labelled as ‘misogynistic' on it's release. But several things make me think it's actually a very conservative depiction of the kind of violence some women are subjected to. Yes, we get to see the sheer horror of Hawker and the crimes he carries out against the women he sees as assertive and liberated. But we also have the film's final act in which the balance is reset and, without giving the ending away, a levelling of the playing fields with an ending that sees Hawker getting the justice he deserves and at the hands of one of the people he wanted to dish it out to. Ballin gets to experience first hand what she's only ever had to talk about regarding other women's lives. There is more retribution by female characters in the film but I'm not going to ruin the film with spoilers here. Also, Visiting Hours doesn't titillate with it's depiction of violence against some of the female characters within the film. And that's a huge reason why I don't think it's misogynistic. It feels like the film has serious things to say about violence against women rather than making a trashy and extreme shocker. Visiting Hours feels utterly serious and is almost devoid of any kind of humour or lighter moments. It's also nasty and mean spirited in tone. In other words, it's perfect for an early 80's slasher movie. Unfortunately, the BBFC didn't agree and the film suffered several cuts for it's cinema release. These cuts were sustained for the eventual video release and the film was also (albeit briefly) put on the Video Nasties list. The casting of the film is also pinpoint perfect which is a major part as to why the film succeeds so brilliantly. Michael Ironside is just as amazing here as Hawker as he was in Scanners as Daryl Revok. He really was fantastic at playing psychopaths. In fact, when I see Ironside's name on a cast list I know that it will be well worth a watch. Lee Grant is fantastic as crusading feminist Ballin and Linda Purl hits just the right tone as nurse Munroe. On top of that we get star power through William Shatner being a cast member and we even get to see the guy with the bald head and moustache from Cagney and Lacey. But the hospital setting is a major part of why this film is so damned effective. Hospitals have always struck me as macabre places and this film feeds into this further. It's why I love hospitals and this film so much. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/19/23 Full Review Audience Member This one was a bit of a chore to watch. It's an early 80's slasher, in which Michael Ironside's character becomes homicidally fixated on a female journalist who is outspoken with regard to violence against women. He then stalks and attacks her repeatedly, resulting a lot of collateral damage killings. While the movie is well acted for the most part, the issue lies with the plot content. There isn't enough meat on this bone to allow for the 105 minute runtime. I found myself frequently looking at the time remaining, and wondering how there could possibly be that much of the movie left. I do love a good slow burn, and thoroughly drawn out tension and suspense in films, but this was just milked and milked far too much. The story should never have been adapted into a feature film. At best, it should have been utilized for some crime drama television series. I don't recommend this one for anybody. I give it a D+. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/07/23 Full Review Audience Member Extremely underrated & unappreciated. The death scenes were surprisingly realistic & uncomfortably unnerving. This film deserves better. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/17/23 Full Review Audience Member this lost my attention pretty early in the game, but i kept it on the whole way through. it's not that good. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 01/20/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Visiting Hours

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW