julie b
Between 2.5 and 3/5. Was drawn in by the cast. I like the blending of story in a story, but all along I just felt like I was missing something because I wasn’t that into it. Some beautiful scenery, good performances, and funny moments, but overall a bit too subtle for my taste so it felt flat.
Thank you for reminding me of The Winner Takes it All!!!
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
09/19/24
Full Review
Sarah G
Animal torture. Throwing living jellyfish at each other and laughing at the torture. Then buying skinned sheep. Horrible.
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
06/13/24
Full Review
Alec B
It is for the best that Bergman is immediately invoked by both the title and the setting, from there they can play around with those classic Bergman themes without it surprising the audience which could be a bit of a disaster. Ultimately it's a bit thin on resolution but still I appreciate the ambition.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
02/09/24
Full Review
Jason R
This is one I would never have watched because of the title - I've no interest in watching any Bergman films and I'm afraid this one just gets tarred with the same brush. However, now I know it's got some ABBA in it, I'm approaching it with slightly more enthusiasm. But not loads...
The film follows Tony (Tim Roth) and Chris (Vicky Krieps) as they decamp to Fårö (which is, unsurprisingly, the island where Ingmar Bergman lived) for the summer in order to do various film related stuff, including working on screenplays for their next films - Tony is racing through his screenplay and really inspired whereas Chris is really struggling.
So we then spend a considerable amount of time watching Chris's screenplay - which seems pretty fully formed to my untrained eye, but it's also not particularly interesting. Although one of her characters does go on an amusing anti-Bergman rant ("Maybe three critics thought he was amazing, but there's a world outside your own asshole. Fuck Bergman!"). But when I say a considerable amount of time, I'm not kidding - there's not far off an hour of the film spent dipping in and out of it.
However, interestingly, towards the end of the screenplay, one of the people that Chris met earlier "in real life" appears - fictional real life begins to blur with fictional fiction and my head begins to hurt. And then, right at the end, things get even more weird - all of which left me feeling very lost and turned what was a reasonably straightforward but dull film into a confusing but dull film. I'm not sure whether that's an improvement or not - I think it probably is because I was somewhat intrigued by my confusion.
It's somewhat surprising this is the second Tim Roth film we've met (and Reservoir Dogs was only done as a one-off special) but the third Vicky Krieps film (after The Phantom Thread and Corsage) - and Vicky has a far bigger role in both her previous films than Tim has in his. But I like them both in this and they're pretty relatable (they certainly have very relatable arguments!), even if they're not the most lovable of characters (and somewhat obsessed with Bergman). I also thought Mia Wasikowska did a good job as Amy, the lead character in Chris's screenplay - it's the first time we've met her but it's the second time we've met Anders Danielsen Lie who gets to play a bit of an asshole (again!).
It's very beautiful to look at - all Scandinavian cottages and windmills in the sunshine with some gorgeous landscapes (although I didn't envy Vicky and the characters in her film diving into the sea). It's competently filmed with a minimum of tricks - nothing particularly impressive to write home about in my opinion but I did read a review that said it was written in a way that male critics wouldn't understand it, so I guess that's me told.
I feel it's trying to make me think about things, but I'm not really sure what things - maybe it's a rumination on the nature of obsession (or maybe fandom would be a better turn of phrase), but I'd have to say I'm not convinced. I'd also say that everyone is very, very earnest in this except for Chris (who often seems pretty lost and miserable) - I can't say it's made me any keener to watch any Bergman films. And the Bergman safari that Tony goes on looks to be the dullest thing imaginable.
I didn't hate this, but I wasn't exactly grabbed by it - it feels like a film designed for the critics to love and, in Empire's case, they very much did. And I'm quite surprised The Guardian didn't - only three stars from them and I actually agree with a lot of their comments. Under normal circumstances I've had deserted this way before the end but I'm glad I stayed because the final weirdness did make me think a bit more about it. But only a bit and it's just a shame I didn't come to any particular conclusion.
At time of writing, it's available to stream on MUBI or to rent in all the usual places, but I'm not sure it will appeal to all that many people - sorry Empire, but this was a miss for me.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
11/29/23
Full Review
Jon V
Charming and challenging.
Rated 4.5/5 Stars •
Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars
11/20/23
Full Review
Reuben M
A couple (Vicky Krieps & Tim Roth) retreat to the island where great director Ingmar Bergman lived and received much inspiration for his work. Although it's never directly stated, it's clear this couple (both screenwriters) is looking for inspiration too, particularly Krieps. The film follows them in a somewhat ambling manner as they explore the island, both together and apart. Their marriage feels a bit that way too; sometimes the two are walking together in general equanimity and other times, you can feel some resentments brewing. Is there some professional resentment there? Roth is older and more "successful" it would seem. Is Krieps, with her minor writers block, stewing at the relative ease with which Roth creates? Are there also personal resentments there? As we go through the film, we get answers to some of this and much remains up to us. It doesn't sound like much a plot to hang a movie on, but mid-way through the film, it takes a turn that makes some sense but is completely unexpected. Just in case you were starting to wonder where all this might be going, your interest is re-ignited at just the right moment. I won't say more, because I managed to avoid spoilers before watching, and that helped my enjoyment. The other thing that makes the film worthwhile is a really stellar performance from Vicky Krieps. All the major roles in the film are well handled (many minor roles are played by island residents, and it kinda shows), but Krieps is the one you can't look away from. Her character goes through the most complex journey and she handles it all well.
I also like how arguments in the film are handled. Roth & Krieps often get along well and have an easy comradery; but they also are often not on the same page. But their fights are low key, and sometimes sort of stop and just simmer for a bit. And then maybe they just peter out rather than coming to a boil. It gives the film a convincing tone. (And the scenery of the island, though a bit stark, is lovely too.)
There is A LOT in the film about Bergman. The residents of the island are all experts on him. A film festival in his honor is held there. The film is steeped in Bergman. Which immediately begs the question: In order to enjoy the film, must one be well-versed in Bergman? I am not, myself. I'm aware of his work, of course, and as a major film buff, I know his work is one of my gaps, I fully acknowledge. So I have a vague awareness of the kinds of films he made. But that's about it. And I enjoyed BERGMAN ISLAND despite my Bergman blank spot.
I'll add further that the Criterion Blu-Ray of the film is top notch (if that's your viewing method). The film itself looks great, with just the right amount of grain to make the whole thing sparkle. And the extras are interesting and entertaining too. Good interviews and insights. And interesting to learn about how the film was made over two summers. Knowing that (after watching the movie) actually made my feelings of a few scenes evolve a little.
Clearly, this is not a film for a mass audience. I frankly can't imagine someone who isn't a fan of "cinema" enjoying it. Slow moving. Most of the action of the film is internal. It's quiet. It's "artsy." It requires sub-titles (yes, it's mostly in English, but I needed them to really understand what many of the Swedish actors were saying). But it's a rich and satisfying entertainment nonetheless.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
08/09/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
>
